On Thursday, September 22, 2016 9:39:34 AM CEST Jean-Marc Liger wrote: > > While we are on that, could we discuss renaming from 'epel-*' to > > 'centos-*'? Because we don't tell the truth entirely if we claim those > > are epel-* chroots. > > To be completeness, you have both centos and epel repositories enabled, > with centos dist tag.
Yup. That's valid argument (to some extent) to have it still named 'epel-*', thanks! The thing is that I already have (as a copr user, not maintainer, and not yet resolved) issues with the fact that there are different packages from those in Koji's `epel-*` .. So the epel in copr is not the same epel as in koji. I'm not sure what to do with this, could Copr finally use the same repos as Koji uses? Pavel _______________________________________________ copr-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
