On Thursday, September 22, 2016 9:39:34 AM CEST Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
> > While we are on that, could we discuss renaming from 'epel-*' to
> > 'centos-*'?  Because we don't tell the truth entirely if we claim those
> > are epel-* chroots.
> To be completeness,  you have both centos and epel repositories enabled, 
> with centos dist tag.

Yup.  That's valid argument (to some extent) to have it still named 'epel-*',

The thing is that I already have (as a copr user, not maintainer, and not yet
resolved) issues with the fact that there are different packages from those in
Koji's `epel-*` ..  So the epel in copr is not the same epel as in koji.

I'm not sure what to do with this, could Copr finally use the same repos as
Koji uses?

copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to