On Thursday, September 22, 2016 9:39:34 AM CEST Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
> > While we are on that, could we discuss renaming from 'epel-*' to
> > 'centos-*'? Because we don't tell the truth entirely if we claim those
> > are epel-* chroots.
> To be completeness, you have both centos and epel repositories enabled,
> with centos dist tag.
Yup. That's valid argument (to some extent) to have it still named 'epel-*',
The thing is that I already have (as a copr user, not maintainer, and not yet
resolved) issues with the fact that there are different packages from those in
Koji's `epel-*` .. So the epel in copr is not the same epel as in koji.
I'm not sure what to do with this, could Copr finally use the same repos as
copr-devel mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org