On Friday, September 23, 2016 1:30:41 PM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 23.9.2016 v 12:44 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a): > > Why can't we differ? > > Because it adds more maintenance overhead.
ATM there is maintenance overhad on our side same as on your side, IIUC. While simple patch would solve my problems, without bothering you. And, TBH, current packaging of copr as-is in Fedora is not useful to anybody else than for Fedora copr. > > Is fedora dist-git ever going support all the repos Copr will support? > > Ideally this should be config driven. Thats right... ideally. > And Fedora and Copr should have the same code, just different configs. I'm not sure what this means for me. Can you elaborate? Do I have to motivate fedpkg maintainers (is anybody from Copr team in fedpkg team?) to accept my patches to solve issue between fedora copr and redhat copr? What I talked about is straight forward patch against your sources, I'm just curious whether you would like to have different naming for your branches, or whether I need to make it optional. Pavel _______________________________________________ copr-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
