[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12634452#action_12634452 ]
Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-4053: ------------------------------------------ bq. 1. I'd expect jobCompleted() to be a no-op, and have jobRemoved() get called when the job is removed. I can only speak from the {{CapacityTaskScheduler}}'s perspective. It cares about jobCompleted, and doesn't care about jobRemoved. Actually, I would have thought jobCompleted is the more important event for a scheduler. While the number of implementations is still small (only four right now), I would still advocate an abstract method and leave the schedulers to actually deal with the implementation. > Schedulers need to know when a job has completed > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-4053 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4053 > Project: Hadoop Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.19.0 > Reporter: Vivek Ratan > Assignee: Amar Kamat > Fix For: 0.19.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-4053-v1.patch > > > The JobInProgressListener interface is used by the framework to notify > Schedulers of when jobs are added, removed, or updated. Right now, there is > no way for the Scheduler to know that a job has completed. jobRemoved() is > called when a job is retired, which can happen many hours after a job is > actually completed. jobUpdated() is called when a job's priority is changed. > We need to notify a listener when a job has completed (either successfully, > or has failed or been killed). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.