[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12634452#action_12634452
 ] 

Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-4053:
------------------------------------------

bq. 1. I'd expect jobCompleted() to be a no-op, and have jobRemoved() get 
called when the job is removed.

I can only speak from the {{CapacityTaskScheduler}}'s perspective. It cares 
about jobCompleted, and doesn't care about jobRemoved. Actually, I would have 
thought jobCompleted is the more important event for a scheduler. While the 
number of implementations is still small (only four right now), I would still 
advocate an abstract method and leave the schedulers to actually deal with the 
implementation.

> Schedulers need to know when a job has completed
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-4053
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4053
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.19.0
>            Reporter: Vivek Ratan
>            Assignee: Amar Kamat
>             Fix For: 0.19.0
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-4053-v1.patch
>
>
> The JobInProgressListener interface is used by the framework to notify 
> Schedulers of when jobs are added, removed, or updated. Right now, there is 
> no way for the Scheduler to know that a job has completed. jobRemoved() is 
> called when a job is retired, which can happen many hours after a job is 
> actually completed. jobUpdated() is called when a job's priority is changed. 
> We need to notify a listener when a job has completed (either successfully, 
> or has failed or been killed). 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to