On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 06:41, Ulf Zibis <ulf.zi...@gmx.de> wrote: > Am 23.03.2010 19:19, schrieb Martin Buchholz: >> >> Ulf, >> >> Please do not delete methods in Surrogate.java >> (because we take compatibility seriously) >> > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/isBMPCodePoint > > I still think, we should stick on Surrogate#isBMP for above compatibility > reason. > Otherwise we too should rename #neededFor etc.
The difference is that isBMP was not provided with any officially supported JDK (i.e. Sun JDK 6). We take compatibility seriously, but not that seriously :) > Please add @author Ulf Zibis $ rg -l '@author.*Zibis' ./src/share/classes/java/lang/Character.java ./src/share/classes/java/lang/AbstractStringBuilder.java ./src/share/classes/java/lang/String.java ./src/share/classes/sun/nio/cs/Surrogate.java > and correct copyright date. I leave that up to the Sun release engineers. Martin
