and pushed...
  http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/2b829a5a46ee

-Chris.

On 11/28/2012 06:51 PM, Jim Gish wrote:
Since we don't yet have a resolution on this, I modified the test code
in question to remove the @SuppressWarnings("unused") and actually
removed the unused references (and retested, of course).

Please review
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgish/Bug8003380-logging-test-warnings/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejgish/Bug8003380-logging-test-warnings/>
and if ok, Chris, could you please go ahead and push the changes?

thanks,
    Jim


On 11/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jim Gish wrote:
Here's the list of @suppresswarnings values that are recognized by
Eclipse Juno:


   Excluding warnings using @SuppressWarnings

Since Java 5.0, you can disable compilation warnings relative to a
subset of a compilation unit using
the|java.lang.SuppressWarning|annotation.

 @SuppressWarning("unused") public void foo() {
  String s;
 }

Without the annotation, the compiler would complain that the local
variable|s|is never used. With the annotation, the compiler silently
ignores this warning locally to the|foo|method. This enables to keep
the warnings in other locations of the same compilation unit or the
same project.

The list of tokens that can be used inside
a|SuppressWarnings|annotation is:

 * allto suppress all warnings
 * boxingto suppress warnings relative to boxing/unboxing operations
 * castto suppress warnings relative to cast operations
 * dep-annto suppress warnings relative to deprecated annotation
 * deprecationto suppress warnings relative to deprecation
 * fallthroughto suppress warnings relative to missing breaks in switch
   statements
 * finallyto suppress warnings relative to finally block that don't
return
 * hidingto suppress warnings relative to locals that hide variable
 * incomplete-switchto suppress warnings relative to missing entries in
   a switch statement (enum case)
 * javadocto suppress warnings relative to javadoc warnings
 * nlsto suppress warnings relative to non-nls string literals
 * nullto suppress warnings relative to null analysis
 * rawtypesto suppress warnings relative to usage of raw types
 * resourceto suppress warnings relative to usage of resources of type
   Closeable
 * restrictionto suppress warnings relative to usage of discouraged or
   forbidden references
 * serialto suppress warnings relative to missing serialVersionUID
   field for a serializable class
 * static-accessto suppress warnings relative to incorrect static access
 * static-methodto suppress warnings relative to methods that could be
   declared as static
 * superto suppress warnings relative to overriding a method without
   super invocations
 * synthetic-accessto suppress warnings relative to unoptimized access
   from inner classes
 * sync-overrideto suppress warnings because of missing synchronize
   when overriding a synchronized method
 * uncheckedto suppress warnings relative to unchecked operations
 * unqualified-field-accessto suppress warnings relative to field
   access unqualified
 * unusedto suppress warnings relative to unused code and dead code

(From
http://help.eclipse.org/juno/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.jdt.doc.isv/guide/jdt%255Fapi%255Fcompile.htm)

Jim

On 11/16/2012 10:02 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
On 11/16/12 6:39 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
The background is that the words that can be supplied to
@SuppressWarnings
reside in an uncontrolled namespace. The JLS [1] defines only
"unchecked" and
any others are compiler-specific. The set of words accepted here by
javac is
the same as the words defined for -Xlint.

[1]
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-9.html#jls-9.6.3.5

Whoops, the JLS defines "deprecation" as well (as Alan pointed out in
another thread the other day). But the rest of the point stands.

s'marks


--
Jim Gish | Consulting Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.0304
Oracle Java Platform Group | Core Libraries Team
35 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
jim.g...@oracle.com

Reply via email to