> On Nov 16, 2016, at 12:30 PM, David DeHaven <david.deha...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Round 3:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddehaven/8169289/jdk.2
> 
> Tested with a jar that had a bad JavaFX-Application-Class and it continued to 
> report the correct class name.

+1

Mandy

Reply via email to