> On Nov 16, 2016, at 12:30 PM, David DeHaven <david.deha...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Round 3: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddehaven/8169289/jdk.2 > > Tested with a jar that had a bad JavaFX-Application-Class and it continued to > report the correct class name.
+1 Mandy
