Martin, > On 22 Feb 2017, at 20:30, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote: > > We half promised "no more jdk9 changes", but ... > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/jsr166-jdk9-integration/ > > as usual, I think they should go into jdk9, but y'all probably tell me it's > too late (and that's OK; we can retarget for jdk10)
Are there any spec changes, or all rewordings that do not affect spec (there’s quite a bit of noise in the webrevs )? > There's only one line of production code change, in ArrayBlockingQueue. > The rest is test and javadoc wording improvements, so the risk to the jdk9 > release is rather low. Sure. Sounds ok. > Because test changes cannot delay a release, I think rampdown rules should > not apply to them the same way. Right, I think that the test changes are fine to be pushed to jdk9/dev. -Chris.
