On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Martin, > > > On 22 Feb 2017, at 20:30, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote: > > > > We half promised "no more jdk9 changes", but ... > > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/ > jsr166-jdk9-integration/ > > > > as usual, I think they should go into jdk9, but y'all probably tell me > it's > > too late (and that's OK; we can retarget for jdk10) > > Are there any spec changes, or all rewordings that do not affect spec > (there’s quite a bit of noise in the webrevs )? > There's only the "spec change" in ThreadPoolExecutor.java. I don't count that as a "real" spec change, because the original intent is clear enough, but you might disagree.
