Changes except for ThreadPoolExecutor.java submitted. ThreadPoolExecutor doc change is deferred to jdk10.
We have a new change, to SubmissionPublisher, which should probably make jdk9 because SubmissionPublisher is new to jdk9. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176155 On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com> > wrote: > >> Martin, >> >> > On 22 Feb 2017, at 20:30, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote: >> > >> > We half promised "no more jdk9 changes", but ... >> > >> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/jsr166- >> jdk9-integration/ >> > >> > as usual, I think they should go into jdk9, but y'all probably tell me >> it's >> > too late (and that's OK; we can retarget for jdk10) >> >> Are there any spec changes, or all rewordings that do not affect spec >> (there’s quite a bit of noise in the webrevs )? >> > > There's only the "spec change" in ThreadPoolExecutor.java. I don't count > that as a "real" spec change, because the original intent is clear enough, > but you might disagree. > >
