On Jan 22, 2018, at 1:09 PM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 22/01/2018 20:49, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> All of the comments included below are addressed in [1]. The difference >> versus webrev.01 are in [2]. The CSR [3] will have to move back to Draft, >> updated, and re-finalized but I will hold off on that until there is a final >> consensus on the verbiage. > "has the same effect as .." is testable but I think it needs be something > like "This method invokes readNBytes with a length of MAX_VALUE" to avoid > needing to override readAllBytes. I can change it. The reason I used that verbiage was to match that of read(byte[]): "The read(b) method for class InputStream has the same effect as: read(b, 0, b.length)" Brian
