+1
On 1/24/2018 2:50 PM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
On Jan 23, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Brian Burkhalter
<brian.burkhal...@oracle.com <mailto:brian.burkhal...@oracle.com>> wrote:
On Jan 23, 2018, at 1:19 AM, Weijun Wang <weijun.w...@oracle.com
<mailto:weijun.w...@oracle.com>> wrote:
+ * Therefore, the method may be safely called with very large
values of
+ * {@code len} provided sufficient memory is available.
What does "sufficient memory" mean? For len, or the number of
available bytes?
It means enough bytes for the collectivity of the intermediate and
returned buffers. This is already stated to be proportional to ‘len’.
All right, to make sure this horse is truly dead here’s one more
revision. The changes with respect to the previous revision are [1]
and the overall changes versus the SCM base are [2]. The .02-.03
differences are:
A) Add an @implNote at line 368.
B) Minor memory use improvement at line 392.
Thanks,
Brian
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8139206/webrev.02-03/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ebpb/8139206/webrev.02-03/>
[2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8139206/webrev.03/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ebpb/8139206/webrev.03/>
