On 05/04/2018 22:45, Tony Printezis wrote:
Hi all,
Advertising
We recently hit another interesting issue with the NIO thread-local
DirectByteBuffer cache. One of our services seems to create and drop
threads at regular intervals. I assume this is due to a thread pool
dynamically resizing itself.
Let's say a thread starts, lives long enough for its Thread object to be
promoted to the old gen (along with its cached direct buffer), then exits.
This will result in its cached direct buffer(s) being unreachable in the
old gen and will only be reclaimed after the next full GC / concurrent GC
cycle.
Right, if a short lived thread does I/O with a buffer backed by an array
in the heap then any direct buffers in its thread local cache won't be
freed until there is a GC and reference processing. It's something that
I've prototyped a few times and always leaned towards not exposing
anything in the API, instead just hooking into the thread exit to clear
the buffer cache. One thing to watch out for is that the buffer cache
may not exist (as the thread didn't do any I/O with heap buffers) so
you'll end up creating (an empty) buffer cache at thread exit. That is
benign of course but still unsettling to have additional code executing
at this time.
-Alan
