> On May 20, 2018, at 11:32 PM, David Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> 3984 public Class<?>[] getNestMembers() {
>> I still think not removing dups is a mistake as it could be a source of
>> subtle bugs. But i doubt at this point i can persuade you or others to
>> change it :-)
>
> Unlikely. :) Again well-formed programs just won't encounter this and it
> would penalize all well-formed programs.
>
Although those well-formed programs may need to check for dups themselves
because they don’t want to rely in implementation details (and they are not
aware of the probability of implementations deviating).
Here’s a thought: did you consider caching the nest members in the
ReflectionData class? that may be worth doing regardless of dups.
Paul.
