Hi Lance,
How about:
Subsequent modifications to any of {@code builder}swill not affect the
returned {@link Process}.
Roger
On 7/13/2018 3:26 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Roger,
I am struggling with the wording at:
———
* Subsequent modifications to any of process builders in the {@code
builders}
1198 * argument will not affect the returned {@link Process}.
————
Maybe specified/provided process builders
Not sure, will think about it a bit.
Otherwise I think the changes are fine
On Jul 13, 2018, at 3:07 PM, Roger Riggs <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Please review a doc change to improve the description of
ProcessBuilder.startPipeline.
The clarifications are not intended to imply any change in behavior
and only focus the description
on the steps taken for each command in the pipeline.
(A CSR will be needed also when the wording is finalized).
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-process-8189717/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erriggs/webrev-process-8189717/>
Issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189717
Thanks, Roger
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif><http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance
Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
