On Tue, 17 May 2022 04:39:06 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> GCC 12 reports as following:
>
> You forced me to look at this in depth. The values are set via the build 
> system. In the build system it is impossible to get just -J because the -J is 
> only added as a prefix for an existing string. So basically this is 
> impossible code to reach unless you manually override the build system 
> definition. So as far as I can see this is a classic case where we want an 
> assert.
> 
> 
> if (arg[0] == '-' && arg[1] == 'J') {
>     assert(arg[2] != '\0', "Invalid JAVA_ARGS or EXTRA_JAVA_ARGS defined by 
> build");
>     *nargv++ = JLI_StringDup(arg + 2);
> }

@dholmes-ora Thanks for your comment!

We cannot use `assert(cond, message)` at here because it is not HotSpot code. 
In imageFile.cpp for libjimage. It uses `assert(cond && message)`, so I use 
this style in new commit, and the warning has gone.

I can change to "normal" `assert` usage at here if it is strange.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8694

Reply via email to