On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 21:12:25 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Well spotted; corrected the code and added additional tests to catch that > case. Thanks. PS From some quick manual inspections, the other recent ports of FDLIBM methods don't look vulnerable to this kind of problem. However, as follow-up work later in 21 I'll implement: JDK-8302800: Augment NaN handling tests of FDLIBM methods. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12608
