On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 13:51:31 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <sh...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Similar to other issues in the same area. I have no PPC32 machine to test >> the build on, but this matches other fixes for other architectures >> (https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/83c096d6e20cd6e1164bc666df1be197a10431eb) >> after this fix the PPC32 Zero build completes fine. > > Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes > brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Switch to PPC32 > - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8315578-ppc-builds > - Fix src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/util/PlatformProps.java.template line 62: > 60: static final boolean TARGET_ARCH_IS_LOONGARCH64 = > "@@OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU@@" == "loongarch64"; > 61: static final boolean TARGET_ARCH_IS_S390 = > "@@OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU@@" == "s390"; > 62: static final boolean TARGET_ARCH_IS_PPC32 = > "@@OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU@@" == "ppc"; The list is getting longer. I'd suggest/request that all the enums be resorted alphabetically. (now or later). ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15556#discussion_r1318671548
