On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 19:26:26 GMT, Mandy Chung <[email protected]> wrote:
> `jdk.lambda.vm.InterfaceAccessFlagsTest` uses `ClassToInterfaceConverter` to
> mechanically convert a classfile for a Class into an in-memory class
> representation of an equivalent Interface. `testPrivateMethodCall` tests to
> invoke a private method. Before nestmates, invoking a private class method
> and a private interface method both use `Invokespecial`. With the nestmate
> changes, the class uses `invokevirtual` but the interface must use
> `invokeinterface` but this conversion is not handled by the existing
> `ClassToInterfaceConverter`.
>
> This fix converts `ClassToInterfaceConverter` to use the Class-File API to
> properly convert a classfile from a class to an interface including method
> invocation from `invokevirtual` to `invokeinterface`. The old custom
> bytecode manipulation code can be dropped.
test/jdk/jdk/lambda/separate/ClassToInterfaceConverter.java line 39:
> 37:
> 38: private byte[] convertToInterface(ClassModel classModel) {
> 39: return Classfile.of().build(classModel.thisClass().asSymbol(),
You can use `transform` to transform a class instead of `build`.
test/jdk/jdk/lambda/separate/ClassToInterfaceConverter.java line 43:
> 41: for (ClassElement ce : classModel) {
> 42: if (ce instanceof AccessFlags accessFlags) {
> 43: classBuilder.withFlags(0x0601); //
> ACC_INTERFACE | ACC_ABSTRACT | ACC_PUBLIC);
We can just use `withFlags(Classfile.ACC_INTERFACE | Classfile.ACC_ABSTRACT |
Classfile.ACC_PUBLIC)` as it's a constant expression and inlined by javac. And
the `accessFlags` variable above appears unused.
test/jdk/jdk/lambda/separate/ClassToInterfaceConverter.java line 52:
> 50: // by other methods in the interface,
> convert it to InterfaceMethodref and
> 51: // if opcode is invokevirtual, convert it to
> invokeinterface
> 52:
> classBuilder.withMethod(mm.methodName().stringValue(),
Same remark, use `classBuilder.transformMethod(mm,
MethodTransform.transformCode((codeBuilder, e) -> {}))`
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16526#discussion_r1384280905
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16526#discussion_r1384279751
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16526#discussion_r1384284062
