On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:36:01 GMT, Doug Lea <d...@openjdk.org> wrote: > This update cascades timeouts to trim subsequent workers after the first > keepAlive inactive period.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 680: > 678: * time out and terminate if the pool has remained quiescent for > 679: * period given by field keepAlive (default 60sec), which applies > 680: * to the first timeout of a fully populated pool. Subsequent (or If I understand this correctly, it means that the entire pool needs to have no work (at all) before starting to decommission workers. Is that the case? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16725#discussion_r1399058194
