> Please review this PR that aims to add all the remaining needed `@since` tags 
> in `java.base`, and group them into a single fix.
> This is related to #18934 and my work around the `@since` checker feature.
> Explicit `@since` tags are needed for some overriding methods for the purpose 
> of the checker.
> 
> I will only give the example with the `CompletableFuture` class but here is 
> the before where the methods only appeared in "Methods declared in interface 
> N"
> 
> <img width="1510" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-06 at 00 06 57" 
> src="https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/assets/96922791/1749a355-133b-4a38-bffe-51ac415b2aac";>
> 
> 
> 
> and after where the method has it's own javadoc, the main description is 
> added and the `@since` tags are added as intended.
> 
> I don't have an account on `https://cr.openjdk.org/` but I could host the 
> generated docs somewhere if that is needed.
> 
> <img width="1511" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-06 at 00 07 16" 
> src="https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/assets/96922791/89b92288-9b5e-48ed-8fa1-9342ea43e043";>
> 
> <img width="1505" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-06 at 00 08 06" 
> src="https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/assets/96922791/9aef08ff-5030-4189-a996-582a7eef849b";>
> 
> <img width="1050" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-06 at 00 09 03" 
> src="https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/assets/96922791/fdd75a26-0396-4c5e-8f59-a3717b7d7ec8";>
> 
> 
> TIA

Nizar Benalla has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  Move security classes changes to pr18373

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18954/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18954/files/62e623fa..d38a1c7d

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=18954&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=18954&range=00-01

  Stats: 2 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18954.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18954/head:pull/18954

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18954

Reply via email to