core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8354724: BufferedReader readAllLines and readString methods [v14] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8354724: BufferedReader readAllLines and readString methods [v14] Markus KARG
  • Re: RFR: 8354724: BufferedReader readAllLines and readString methods [v14] Markus KARG
  • Re: RFR: 8354724: BufferedReader readAllLines and readString methods [v14] Markus KARG
  • Re: RFR: 8354724: BufferedReader readAllLines and readString methods [v14] Brian Burkhalter
• Re: RFR: 8353888: Implement JEP 510: Key Derivation Function API [v6] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8353888: Implement JEP 510: Key Derivation Function API [v6] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8353888: Implement JEP 510: Key Derivation Function API [v6] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8353888: Implement JEP 510: Key Derivation Function API [v6] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8353888: Implement JEP 510: Key Derivation Function API [v6] Sean Mullan
• RFR: 8351230: Collections.synchronizedList returns a list that is not thread-safe Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8351230: Collections.synchronizedList returns a list that is not thread-safe Luca Kellermann
  • Re: RFR: 8351230: Collections.synchronizedList returns a list that is not thread-safe [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8351230: Collections.synchronizedList returns a list that is not thread-safe [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8351230: Collections.synchronizedList returns a list that is not thread-safe [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351230: Collections.synchronizedList returns a list that is not thread-safe [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8351230: Collections.synchronizedList returns a list that is not thread-safe [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8351230: Collections.synchronizedList returns a list that is not thread-safe [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8351230: Collections.synchronizedList returns a list that is not thread-safe [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8351230: Collections.synchronizedList returns a list that is not thread-safe [v3] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8351230: Collections.synchronizedList returns a list that is not thread-safe [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8351230: Collections.synchronizedList returns a list that is not thread-safe Stuart Marks
• Re: RFR: 8355954: File.delete removes read-only files (win) [v3] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355954: File.delete removes read-only files (win) [v3] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355954: File.delete removes read-only files (win) [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355954: File.delete removes read-only files (win) [v3] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355954: File.delete removes read-only files (win) [v3] Bernd
  • Re: RFR: 8355954: File.delete removes read-only files (win) [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355954: File.delete removes read-only files (win) [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355954: File.delete removes read-only files (win) [v3] Johannes Döbler
  • Re: RFR: 8355954: File.delete removes read-only files (win) [v3] Brian Burkhalter
• Re: RFR: 8353489: Increase timeout and improve Windows compatibility in test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8353489: Increase timeout and improve Windows compatibility in test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8353489: Increase timeout and improve Windows compatibility in test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java Oleksii Sylichenko
  • Re: RFR: 8353489: Increase timeout and improve Windows compatibility in test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8353489: Increase timeout and improve Windows compatibility in test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java [v2] Oleksii Sylichenko
• Re: RFR: 8356050: Problemlist jdk, langtools & lib-test tier1 tests requiring runtime usages of <jdk>/bin/tools for static-jdk [v2] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8356050: Problemlist jdk, langtools & lib-test tier1 tests requiring runtime usages of <jdk>/bin/tools for static-jdk [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8356050: Problemlist jdk, langtools & lib-test tier1 tests requiring runtime usages of <jdk>/bin/tools for static-jdk [v2] Jiangli Zhou
• Re: RFR: 8349176: Speed up Integer/Long.toString via StringConcatHelper::newArray [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8349176: Speed up Integer/Long.toString via StringConcatHelper::newArray [v3] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8349176: Speed up Integer/Long.toString via StringConcatHelper::newArray [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8349176: Speed up Integer/Long.toString via StringConcatHelper::newArray [v3] Shaojin Wen
• Re: RFR: 8355177: Speed up StringBuilder::append(char[]) via UTF16::compress & Unsafe::copyMemory [v4] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8355177: Speed up StringBuilder::append(char[]) via UTF16::compress & Unsafe::copyMemory [v4] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8355177: Speed up StringBuilder::append(char[]) via Unsafe::copyMemory [v4] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8355177: Speed up StringBuilder::append(char[]) via Unsafe::copyMemory [v4] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8355177: Speed up StringBuilder::append(char[]) via UTF16::compress & Unsafe::copyMemory [v4] Markus KARG
• Re: RFR: 8351443: Improve robustness of StringBuilder [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8351443: Improve robustness of StringBuilder [v3] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8351443: Improve robustness of StringBuilder [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8351443: Improve robustness of StringBuilder [v3] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Christoph
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Christoph
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Christoph
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Michael Hall
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Christoph
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Michael Hall
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Christoph
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Michael Hall
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Michael Hall
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Michael Hall
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Michael Hall
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Christoph
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Christoph
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Michael Hall
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Christoph
  • Re: RFR: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions Alexey Semenyuk
• Re: RFR: 8355022: Implement JEP 506: Scoped Values [v4] Andrew Haley
• Integrated: 8355444: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on "os.name" property value Brian Burkhalter
• Integrated: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value Brian Burkhalter
• Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value Brian Burkhalter
• Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value [v2] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value [v2] Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8356040: java/util/PluggableLocale/LocaleNameProviderTest.java timed out Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8356040: java/util/PluggableLocale/LocaleNameProviderTest.java timed out Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8356040: java/util/PluggableLocale/LocaleNameProviderTest.java timed out [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8356040: java/util/PluggableLocale/LocaleNameProviderTest.java timed out [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8356040: java/util/PluggableLocale/LocaleNameProviderTest.java timed out Justin Lu
• Re: RFR: 8353888: Implement JEP 510: Key Derivation Function API [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8353888: Implement JEP 510: Key Derivation Function API [v5] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8353888: Implement JEP 510: Key Derivation Function API [v5] Sean Mullan
• Re: RFR: 8351996: Behavioral updates for ClassValue::remove [v12] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351996: Behavioral updates for ClassValue::remove [v12] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8351996: Behavioral updates for ClassValue::remove [v12] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351996: Behavioral updates for ClassValue::remove [v12] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8351996: Behavioral updates for ClassValue::remove [v12] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8351996: Behavioral updates for ClassValue::remove [v12] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath [v2] fabioromano1
• RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v4] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v4] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v3] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v4] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v5] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v6] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v6] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v6] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v6] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v6] Kevin Rushforth
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v7] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v7] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v7] Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v7] Kevin Rushforth
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v7] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v7] Kevin Rushforth
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v8] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v9] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v9] Iris Clark
  • Integrated: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Nizar Benalla
• Re: RFR: 8353197: Document preconditions for JavaLangAccess methods Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8353197: Document preconditions for JavaLangAccess methods [v2] Volkan Yazici
• Integrated: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Maurizio Cimadamore
• Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8355992: Add unsignedMultiplyExact and *powExact methods to Math and StrictMath Raffaello Giulietti
• Re: RFR: 8347408: Create an internal method handle adapter for system calls with errno [v6] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8347408: Create an internal method handle adapter for system calls with errno [v6] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v7] Shaojin Wen
• Re: RFR: 8343829: Unify decimal and hexadecimal parsing in FloatingDecimal [v7] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8343829: Unify decimal and hexadecimal parsing in FloatingDecimal [v7] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343829: Unify decimal and hexadecimal parsing in FloatingDecimal [v7] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8343829: Unify decimal and hexadecimal parsing in FloatingDecimal [v7] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343829: Unify decimal and hexadecimal parsing in FloatingDecimal [v7] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8343829: Unify decimal and hexadecimal parsing in FloatingDecimal [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343829: Unify decimal and hexadecimal parsing in FloatingDecimal [v7] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8343829: Unify decimal and hexadecimal parsing in FloatingDecimal [v7] Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements [v6] kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355726: LinkedBlockingDeque fixes and improvements [v6] kabutz
• Re: RFR: 8355444: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on "os.name" property value [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8355444: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on "os.name" property value [v6] Brian Burkhalter

• Later messages