On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 18:03:16 GMT, Mandy Chung <mch...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I expect that the jmodless tests will first build an image (say `image1`) >> using jlink `--generate-linkable-runtime` option and then verify >> `image1/bin/jlink` that links from the run-time image. I don't see >> `--generate-linkable-runtime` option is used from jmodless tests. I looked >> at `AbstractLinkableRuntimeTest` which provides the support to create >> linkable runtime image but not obvious to me. Can you describe the idea of >> this test framework? > >> I expect that the jmodless tests will first build an image (say `image1`) >> using jlink `--generate-linkable-runtime` option and then verify >> `image1/bin/jlink` that links from the run-time image. I don't see >> `--generate-linkable-runtime` option is used from jmodless tests. I looked >> at `AbstractLinkableRuntimeTest` which provides the support to create >> linkable runtime image but not obvious to me. Can you describe the idea of >> this test framework? > > OK. I see this now (`@requires jlink.runtime.linkable` in all jmodless > tests). I.e. No test for the default JDK build. > > I think this feature needs test verification even for the default JDK build. > One way to do that is to build a test image (say `base-image`) using jlink > `--generate-linkable-runtime` option and then verify `base-image/bin/jlink` > instead of the JDK. Thanks for the reviews so far! Especially @mlchung who was tremendously helpful! I very much appreciate the support, Mandy! I think I've addressed all the comments and hope this will be ready for integration soon. The JEP has been targeted and that leaves about a month for this PR to be integrated. I do hope, though, that we can integrate it a few weeks before RDP1 of JDK 24 so as to avoid the last minute crunch time. I'd be happy to fix any remaining blockers and then follow-up with any needed tasks after initial integration of course. Therefore, paging @AlanBateman @mlchung @mbreinhold @magicus for their final thoughts. Thank you! ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#issuecomment-2460054319