On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 9:22 AM Ethan McCue <et...@mccue.dev> wrote:
> Just so there are some strawman arguments against: > To pile on... If I go to a restaurant and order a hamburger and they bring me a cheeseburger and also charge me extra for it, I'm going to complain! A Set and a SequencedSet are two different things. The latter comes with cheese but also has a higher cost. If I order a Set and get a SequencedSet, I am going to wonder why am I paying extra for preserving insertion order? If I order a Set and get a SortedSet, I am going to wonder why am I paying extra for keeping the elements sorted? If I order a SortedSet and get a NavigableSet, I am going to wonder why am I paying extra for navigation? If I had wanted a SequencedSet, I would have asked for one. So YES I am also agreeing here that there should be a SequencedSet.of() method to handle this need. -Archie -- Archie L. Cobbs
