What can be done is to have Set.of()/Map.of() to delegate to
SequenceSet.of()/SequenceMap.of() so there is only one implementation at
runtime.
Also, technically, there is a way to change the return type in a binary
compatible way ... if union types are supported in the language.
In that case, Set.of() can be declared like this
static <E> Set<E> | SequenceSet<E> of(E... ) {
...
}
because of erasure, the binary descriptor will use Set, but the Signature will
be Set<E> | SequenceSet<E> so the compiler will see the return type as a
SequencedSet .
Obviously, union types is a far bigger features than adding
SequenceSet/SequenceMap so it's a big if, but it may happen in the future.
Rémi
> From: "joe darcy" <[email protected]>
> To: "core-libs-dev" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2025 6:30:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Factory methods for SequencedSet and SequencedMap
> On 1/16/2025 11:26 PM, Rafael Winterhalter wrote:
>> Would it even be possible to change the return types of Set.of(...) and
>> Map.of(...) without breaking binary compatibility?
> In short, no.
[...]
> -Joe
Rémi
