On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 20:46:04 GMT, Naoto Sato <na...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The main focus of this commit is to straighten out the logic between the 
>> platform-specific and platform-independent layers.
>> 
>> In the previous state of this file, tracing the origin of the properties on 
>> Windows, I ended up following the origin of sprops.encoding all the way 
>> through SetupI18nProps, only to find that was ignored entirely at the 
>> platform-independent layer. So this change is an improvement in that it 
>> clarifies where sprops.encoding comes from, and that SetupI18nProps does 
>> some computations that end up being thrown away instead of being stored into 
>> a shared data structure that's eventually ignored.
>> 
>> Of course that path is dead code and could be removed without changing the 
>> behavior. But this code has a tortured history and it's not entirely clear 
>> that it's correct in its current state. In fact @naotoj considered making 
>> some changes in this logic 
>> [JDK-8352917](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8352917) but decided 
>> against it. However it seems like a possibility that we might revisit this?
>> 
>> Also note that we're now talking about how Windows gets its encoding 
>> information from the OS, and not how encoding information is transmitted up 
>> through the layers into Java properties, which is the focus of this cleanup.
>> 
>> Anyway I'd like to hear from @naotoj on this. If we're certain the extra 
>> stuff in SetupI18nProps is useless, we should clean it up now. But if there 
>> might be a use for this information -- maybe stdin.encoding? -- then perhaps 
>> it's better to leave it as is.
>
> I belive they can be removed as they are no where used (and I don't think it 
> will be used for `stdin.encoding` either) So I prefer removing those unused 
> code now.

OK, I've done so. Now testing on Windows....

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24607#discussion_r2047986885

Reply via email to