On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 19:44:02 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Some AccessFlag parsing methods throw IAE because a flag mask is not valid
>> in a location. However, there is no easy way to check what flag mask bits or
>> what flags are valid for a location. We need such APIs to check, specific to
>> each class file format version.
>>
>> Also in the investigation, it's noted that `ACC_SYNTHETIC` is incorrectly
>> represented - it is available since release 5.0 instead of release 7. This
>> bug is fixed together for implementation simplicity.
>>
>> The new methods are all in `AccessFlag.Location`:
>> - `Set<AccessFlag> flags()`
>> - `int flagsMask()`
>> - `Set<AccessFlag> flags(ClassFileFormatVersion)`
>> - `int flagsMask(ClassFileFormatVersion)`
>>
>> Also there is some simplification to `AccessFlag` itself to remove the
>> anonymous classes, which should be more startup-friendly.
>>
>> Testing: Tier 1-3
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Fix iterator missing NSEE
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/AccessFlag.java line 722:
> 720: }
> 721:
> 722: private static final class AccessFlagSet extends
> AbstractSet<AccessFlag> {
This should probably also define the spliterator method:
@Override
public Spliterator<AccessFlag> spliterator() {
return Spliterators.spliterator(
this,
Spliterator.DISTINCT | Spliterator.ORDERED |
Spliterator.SIZED
| Spliterator.NONNULL | Spliterator.IMMUTABLE |
Spliterator.SUBSIZED
);
}
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23095#discussion_r2062674913
