On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:08:02 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti <rgiulie...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> * Performance enhancements in `pow()`, which is of general interest and >>> does not require submitting a >>> [CSR](https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/csr/Main). >> >> @rgiulietti Yes, but here, the primary enhancement in `pow()` is not >> concerned most on execution time, but rather in memory optimization, because >> the PR implementation does the "shift of the exponent" squaring the result >> rather than the base, so the base is not squared like in the current >> implementation, and this permits to save about half of the memory. >> >>> To make progress here, I suggest to split this PR in two, if technically >>> possible: >>> >>> * One for the enhancements in `pow`, with JMH results before/after. >>> * Another PR for the proposed _n_-th root. >> >> I'm not very sure if it is technically possible, because both `pow()` and >> `nthRoot()` requires the computation of a power of a long, so that code has >> to be shared by both methods, and so a supposed PR for `nthRoot()` would >> require that method. > > @fabioromano1 What's going on here? I guess this splits the original PR in > two parts, as suggested? > It would be better to discuss such matters before submitting a PR. > > I created a new JBS issue to refer to. > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8355719 > Let me know if the new title and the description convey the gist of the PR. > > The current JBS issue is about speed improvements in multiplication and > exponentiation, and is closed as Resolved since more than 10 years. > Please adjust the PR accordingly, by changing the title. > > Also, your claims about memory consumption reduction should be supported by > evidence using [JMH](https://github.com/openjdk/jmh/) benchmarks. > See [this > sample](https://github.com/openjdk/jmh/blob/master/jmh-samples/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmh/samples/JMHSample_35_Profilers.java) > for how to measure memory allocation rates. @rgiulietti The title and description of the JBS issue are ok. I've added tests for comparing time and memory consumption. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24690#issuecomment-2835899308