On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:08:02 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti <rgiulie...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>>> * Performance enhancements in `pow()`, which is of general interest and 
>>> does not require submitting a 
>>> [CSR](https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/csr/Main).
>> 
>> @rgiulietti Yes, but here, the primary enhancement in `pow()` is not 
>> concerned most on execution time, but rather in memory optimization, because 
>> the PR implementation does the "shift of the exponent" squaring the result 
>> rather than the base, so the base is not squared like in the current 
>> implementation, and this permits to save about half of the memory.
>> 
>>> To make progress here, I suggest to split this PR in two, if technically 
>>> possible:
>>> 
>>> * One for the enhancements in `pow`, with JMH results before/after.
>>> * Another PR for the proposed _n_-th root.
>> 
>> I'm not very sure if it is technically possible, because both `pow()` and 
>> `nthRoot()` requires the computation of a power of a long, so that code has 
>> to be shared by both methods, and so a supposed PR for `nthRoot()` would 
>> require that method.
>
> @fabioromano1 What's going on here? I guess this splits the original PR in 
> two parts, as suggested?
> It would be better to discuss such matters before submitting a PR.
> 
> I created a new JBS issue to refer to.
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8355719
> Let me know if the new title and the description convey the gist of the PR.
> 
> The current JBS issue is about speed improvements in multiplication and 
> exponentiation, and is closed as Resolved since more than 10 years.
> Please adjust the PR accordingly, by changing the title.
> 
> Also, your claims about memory consumption reduction should be supported by 
> evidence using [JMH](https://github.com/openjdk/jmh/) benchmarks.
> See [this 
> sample](https://github.com/openjdk/jmh/blob/master/jmh-samples/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmh/samples/JMHSample_35_Profilers.java)
>  for how to measure memory allocation rates.

@rgiulietti The title and description of the JBS issue are ok. I've added tests 
for comparing time and memory consumption.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24690#issuecomment-2835899308

Reply via email to