On Mon, 12 May 2025 11:45:29 GMT, Per Minborg <pminb...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This PR proposes to add a safety net around closing the executor. >> Apparently, in some rare configuration, the VT is not run/notified correctly. >> >> Not completing the test for such a configuration is unlikely to mask >> potential issues that this test is supposed to reveal. > > Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Add @bug definition I assume the changes to switch this from wait/notify to CountDownLatch aren't needed. A carrier can't terminate with a mounted virtual thread. It's okay to change the test but I think the original issue is about Zero or running with -XX:-VMContinautions. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25177#issuecomment-2872382778
