On Mon, 5 May 2025 23:36:35 GMT, Stuart Marks <sma...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Collections.synchronizedList() returns a List implementation that doesn't do
>> proper locking. This PR does the following on the synchronized wrapper:
>>
>> - overrides and adds locking to SequencedCollection methods;
>> - performs instance management of reversed synchronized views;
>> - adds test for race conditions and functional tests of synchronized
>> wrappers.
>
> Stuart Marks has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Reversed view of SynchronizedRandomAccessList should also be RandomAccess.
> Add tests to ensure RandomAccess is preserved when reversing.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Collections.java line 2782:
> 2780: synchronized (mutex) {list.sort(c);}
> 2781: }
> 2782: public void addFirst(E element) {
Are these overloads strictly needed as the `default` implementations will
delegate to `get` and `set`, which, in turn, are thread safe?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24990#discussion_r2091040080
