On Mon, 5 May 2025 23:36:35 GMT, Stuart Marks <sma...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Collections.synchronizedList() returns a List implementation that doesn't do 
>> proper locking. This PR does the following on the synchronized wrapper:
>> 
>> - overrides and adds locking to SequencedCollection methods;
>> - performs instance management of reversed synchronized views;
>> - adds test for race conditions and functional tests of synchronized 
>> wrappers.
>
> Stuart Marks has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Reversed view of SynchronizedRandomAccessList should also be RandomAccess.
>   Add tests to ensure RandomAccess is preserved when reversing.

The fix and tests look good to me. I just have a nit that I've included as a 
review comment for the new test.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by jpai (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24990#pullrequestreview-2846098206

Reply via email to