On Mon, 19 May 2025 17:16:58 GMT, fabioromano1 <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I think the suggestion is fine. > > Yes, but perhaps in the current version it's more clear what is the returned > value according to the condition. One could see the suggested variant as "return magBitLength(), except for a corrective term in case blah blah..." ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25166#discussion_r2096209014
