> We recently [discussed] the possibility of introducing saturating arithmetic > for deadline computation. Consider this PR as a starting point. Once we agree > on the implementation, I'll file a CSR. > > I created a method in `Instant` to add `Duration`. One could argue that the > proper way would be to go all the way and create a method in `Temporal` to > add `TemporalAmount`. Or maybe even expand the functionality, and create an > additional method in `Temporal` to subtract `TemporalAmount`. > > My current thinking is that if we were to do that, there would be a lot of > expensive, unused code. Saturating logic seems to be only useful for > `Instant` and `Duration`. > > Even if we decide to extend `Temporal` to add/subtract `TemporalAmount`, it > could always be done later. From the perspective of `Instant`, > `plus(TemporalAmount)` will be just an overload of `plus(Duration)`. > > [discussed]: > https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2025-September/151098.html
Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional commits since the last revision: - Simplify impl - Clarify spec - Revert "Add Instant.minusSaturating(Duration)" This reverts commit 35537856f1759c7abbe2b5c5bbb267a90612f729. - Add test for null ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27549/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27549/files/e7207a08..3bc1e0e2 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=27549&range=07 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=27549&range=06-07 Stats: 117 lines in 2 files changed: 19 ins; 88 del; 10 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27549.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27549/head:pull/27549 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27549
