> Can I please get a review of this change which addresses the issue noted in 
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8369181?
> 
> As noted in that issue, if `finish()` is called on a `InflaterOutputStream` 
> that was constructed without passing a `Inflater`, then any subsequent 
> `write()`s on that `InflaterOutputStream` result in an 
> `IllegalStateException`, because we close the `Inflater` in `finish()`. The 
> commit in this PR, fixes the issue by throwing the specified `IOException` in 
> place of the `IllegalStateException`. 
> 
> At the same time, the documentation of `finish()` has been enhanced to 
> clarify the current behaviour, through a `@implSpec`.
> 
> Alternative approaches of deprecating finish() and/or not closing the default 
> Inflater were considered, but given the current long standing implementation 
> of finish(), it was decided to merely specify the current behaviour of 
> closing the  default Inflater in finish().
> 
> A new jtreg test has been added to reproduce the issue and verify the fix. 
> tier1, tier2, tier3 testing of this change completed without any related 
> issues.
> 
> I'll file a CSR shortly for this change.

Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  writes any ... instead of writes out any ...

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29935/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29935/files/60419594..70c7e254

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=29935&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=29935&range=01-02

  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29935.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/29935/head:pull/29935

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29935

Reply via email to