On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 19:02:41 GMT, Sean Mullan <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Alternate implementation - this version only contains one argument - the 
>> name of the properties file. If an include statement is needed, it should be 
>> inserted in the properties file and it will always be added as the last line 
>> of the the conf/security/java.security configuration file.. 
>> 
>> See https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/30635 for the other implementation. 
>> 
>> This is a new jlink plugin which allows the user to specify values of 
>> security properties it wants to override in the conf/security/java.security 
>> configuration file in a custom runtime image. This enhancement, along with 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/29700 allow users to more easily create 
>> runtimes that address the specific security requirements of their 
>> applications.
>> 
>> The command-line syntax takes a file containing properties that the user 
>> wants to override. The file can also contain an include statement which will 
>> be added as the last line of the conf/security/java.security configuration 
>> file.
>> 
>> For example:
>> 
>> jlink --security-properties props.security
>> 
>> where props.security is a file containing one more more properties in the 
>> java.security file syntax.
>> 
>> ---------
>> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the 
>> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
>
> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Remove trailing whitespace.

If the new security property file contains certain settings that could make 
some root CA certs in the current `cacerts` file unusable (for example: disable 
RSA key), is it possible to print out a warning?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31884#issuecomment-5532568758

Reply via email to