On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 16:16:46 GMT, Justin Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
> I thought we wanted this to only occur when there are no available > implementations No available implementations and setSyncResolver has not set a SyncResolver. The change in behavior is that it is allowed to fail, which is the intent of the proposal/PR. So I think we are in sync, it's just that the description of the exception only lists one of the two conditions. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33329#discussion_r4261327921
