On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 03:06:43AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > My goal was to have the same name in the dts which is also used as > > variable name in C code. The existing code has a somewhat peculiar > > mapping from organic growth over time: > > mainboard-vendor -> const char *mainboard_vendor > > mainboard-name -> const char *mainboard_part_number > > If we can agree on whether the variable should be called > > "mainboard_name" or "mainboard_part_number", I'd be willing to prepare a > > patch.
mainboard_name sounds good. > OK, here comes a patch which makes mainboard-vendor naming more consistent. > mainboard-name naming has been postponed because it's not clear what the > real name should be. > > Generated code is identical to the state before the patch. > > Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-tested with a few targets. Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
