On 22.07.2008 20:39, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 22.07.2008 19:56, Marc Jones wrote: > >> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> ... >> >>>> + (c) Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 2004-2008 >>>> + >>>> + The enclosed microcode is intended to be used with AMD >>>> + Microprocessors. You may copy, view and install the >>>> + enclosed microcode only for development and deployment of >>>> + firmware, BIOS, or operating system code for computer >>>> + systems that contain AMD processors. You are not >>>> + authorized to use the enclosed microcode for any other >>>> + purpose. >>>> >>>> >>> I trust that AMD is not going to hunt us down if we check out the >>> complete svn tree (copy) with the intent to develop for non-AMD systems. >>> Still, the legalese feels a bit weird. >>> >> You bring this up every time I update microcode patches. This has been >> worked out in the past. The statement seems very straight forward to >> me (but I am not a lawyer). >> > > I wish to apologize. I can't seem to remember having made a similar > statement in the past, but I'm not going to object the inclusion of this > code. Go ahead. >
I think I dug up the license objection you're referring to and it was made by Stefan. http://coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2008-April/033624.html Anyway, you made the intent clear and I won't complain in the future. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
