On 23.07.2008 17:55, Marc Jones wrote: > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> On 22.07.2008 20:39, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >>> On 22.07.2008 19:56, Marc Jones wrote: >>>> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >>>> ... >>>> >>>>>> + (c) Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 2004-2008 >>>>>> + >>>>>> + The enclosed microcode is intended to be used with AMD >>>>>> + Microprocessors. You may copy, view and install the >>>>>> + enclosed microcode only for development and deployment of >>>>>> + firmware, BIOS, or operating system code for computer >>>>>> + systems that contain AMD processors. You are not >>>>>> + authorized to use the enclosed microcode for any other >>>>>> + purpose. >>>>>> >>>>> I trust that AMD is not going to hunt us down if we check out the >>>>> complete svn tree (copy) with the intent to develop for non-AMD >>>>> systems. >>>>> Still, the legalese feels a bit weird. >>>>> >>>> You bring this up every time I update microcode patches. This has been >>>> worked out in the past. The statement seems very straight forward to >>>> me (but I am not a lawyer). >>>> >>> I wish to apologize. I can't seem to remember having made a similar >>> statement in the past, but I'm not going to object the inclusion of >>> this >>> code. Go ahead. >>> >> I think I dug up the license objection you're referring to and it was >> made by Stefan. >> http://coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2008-April/033624.html >> >> Anyway, you made the intent clear and I won't complain in the future. >> > Seems that I am the one that needs to apologize. I thought you had > brought this up before. I am sorry for blaming you for something you > hadn't done.
No offense taken. I'm happy the situation is resolved. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
