Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 22.07.2008 20:39, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 22.07.2008 19:56, Marc Jones wrote:
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
...
+ (c) Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 2004-2008
+
+ The enclosed microcode is intended to be used with AMD
+ Microprocessors. You may copy, view and install the
+ enclosed microcode only for development and deployment of
+ firmware, BIOS, or operating system code for computer
+ systems that contain AMD processors. You are not
+ authorized to use the enclosed microcode for any other
+ purpose.
I trust that AMD is not going to hunt us down if we check out the
complete svn tree (copy) with the intent to develop for non-AMD systems.
Still, the legalese feels a bit weird.
You bring this up every time I update microcode patches. This has been
worked out in the past. The statement seems very straight forward to
me (but I am not a lawyer).
I wish to apologize. I can't seem to remember having made a similar
statement in the past, but I'm not going to object the inclusion of this
code. Go ahead.
I think I dug up the license objection you're referring to and it was
made by Stefan.
http://coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2008-April/033624.html
Anyway, you made the intent clear and I won't complain in the future.
Seems that I am the one that needs to apologize. I thought you had
brought this up before. I am sorry for blaming you for something you
hadn't done.
Marc
--
Marc Jones
Senior Firmware Engineer
(970) 226-9684 Office
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.amd.com/embeddedprocessors
--
coreboot mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
