On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:34 PM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Marc Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That gets us back to relocating or mutilple copies in the stages. I am ok >> with multiple copies in the ROM but it should be on version in the source. >> The problem with v2 is that there was ROMCC versions and main coreboot >> versions. > > The beauty of carl-daniel's redesign of the "call ROM" stuff is that > we can have the same printk code in stage2 as in ROM and there is no > symbol conflict. But we now have to pretty much put all stage0 stuff > in stage2 as well. no choice. > > Myles, caching won't help. > > ron >
somehow, we diverged from the list. OK, fun new story: you CAN NOT, while running VGA roms, call code in ROM. So stage2 has to be standalone. Makefiles must change.patches welcome. ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
