On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The explanations by Tom and Marc made a few things clear for me: > - The physical HT structure is not what we want to model. > - The appearance of HT and topology in PCI config space is what matters. > - 18.0 is not a PCI bridge, don't pretend it is one > > With that in mind, I'd like to propose another dts. > I know that it has its own quirks, but it can serve as a discussion point. >
I'm beginning to feel like we're thinking too much. The fact is that whether or not the three HT links are a bridge, there is routing in there that makes each link logically the parent of a different set of devices. do we call that a bridge? I don't know what to do with [EMAIL PROTECTED] ah well it's been a long day, will look at this later. For now let's get myles patch in and try to see where that goes. I think I'm not ready for this dts. But if myles wants to try it that's fine too. ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
