----- Original Message ---- > From: Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: ron minnich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Myles Watson wrote: > > ..... > > Marc made the case that things such as superio should not even be > > "under" the lpc in the dts, since they stand "outside" the tree in > > some sense. He argued that we should instead put them at top level. > > There is merit to his argument. This would simplify the lpc code as > > well. > > I think it's fine to have the lpc define resources since that's who > implements them, but I like the idea of the resource being visible from the > domain (maybe not outside the tree.) > I think you either have a separate legacy/subtractive/isa/lpc domain or it needs to be under the isa/lpc pci device. What I didn't really like was that it was uncontained in the domain. It was just sitting at the top level pci bus. BUT that is just a nit. Documented correctly etc I could live with it. Marc -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
