> -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 11:43 AM > To: Myles Watson; ron minnich > Cc: Coreboot > Subject: Re: [coreboot] Subtractive Resources > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ron minnich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Myles Watson wrote: > > > > ..... > > > Marc made the case that things such as superio should not even be > > > "under" the lpc in the dts, since they stand "outside" the tree in > > > some sense. He argued that we should instead put them at top level. > > > There is merit to his argument. This would simplify the lpc code as > > > well. > > > > I think it's fine to have the lpc define resources since that's who > > implements them, but I like the idea of the resource being visible from > the > > domain (maybe not outside the tree.) > > > > I think you either have a separate legacy/subtractive/isa/lpc domain or it > needs to be under the isa/lpc pci device. What I didn't really like was > that it was uncontained in the domain.
I agree. > It was just sitting at the top > level pci bus. BUT that is just a nit. Documented correctly etc I could > live with it. Let's try to put it in the right place. I don't think we want to wait until v4 :) Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
