On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ron minnich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 2:51 PM
>> To: Myles Watson
>> Cc: Marc Jones; Rudolf Marek; Coreboot
>> Subject: Re: [coreboot] Resource Allocation discussion
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Do we want to take fixed resources into account in the allocator?
>>
>> I would think so.
>
> I would too, but v2 didn't and did pretty well.  I'm interested to see an
> idea for the resource allocation algorithm that allocates from largest to
> smallest resource, except when it's skipping fixed resources.
>
> I think it's doable, but nothing like what we have.

That surprises me. I thought it does, which is how/why you can get rid
of DEVICE_MEM_HIGH. Otherwise you would clobber the ROM and the APIC.

And that brings up where to reserve the ROM space. In the southbridge
subtractive device code I guess?



Marc

--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to