On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 04:25:56AM +0200, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > On T, 2009-01-27 at 20:02 -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > > The log output at default loglevel of 1 is attached. At higher log > > > levels the last dump seems to come from a different place. Should I > > > gather such logs with a larger loglevel or does this say something > > > revealing already? Anything else I can provide here? > > > > Those messages aren't reporting a problem - I see them on my epia-cn > > and on qemu. You'll need to increase the debugging level to see if > > something else is seen before a failure. > > The output at loglevel 20 is very noisy, it will be probably too high > for attachment even. The end few kilobytes of output should be as good > probably? I can put it on some webspace though if there's a chance the > non-tail parts of it could help.
You can gzip it and mail it to me directly, put it on a website, etc. Debug level 20 tends to show all the irqs - which can adversely impact the boot because of timing. So sending both the log from debug level 20 and a log with debug level 8 would help. -Kevin -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
