On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:26 PM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think moving the v3 style printk to v2 makes the most sense.


If we're going to keep spending time making v2 more v3-like (printk, CBFS,
Kconfig, etc), then why even bother with v3? v3 seems like it's got some
really great advantages, but noone seems to care about finishing it.

-Corey
-- 
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to