On 27.04.2009 21:32, Corey Osgood wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:26 PM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I think moving the v3 style printk to v2 makes the most sense. >> > > > If we're going to keep spending time making v2 more v3-like (printk, CBFS, > Kconfig, etc), then why even bother with v3? v3 seems like it's got some > really great advantages, but noone seems to care about finishing it. >
I still hope we can whip v2 in shape well enough that major parts can be transplanted into v3. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
