Luc Verhaegen wrote: > That was mighty fast :) I read it through and I liked it.
> Since this changes "known" behaviour of cmos options, i would > prefer at least a second Ack though, especially since the above > reasoning might not be agreed with fully by all. Sure. > A quick suggestion would be this: Or store a 32 bit CRC in NVRAM, calculated from a canonicalized form of the cmos.layout contents. > Minor number should be bumped on additional entries or additional > values, so that only newer option tables (from cb tables or from > cmos.layout) are allowed by nvram_tool. Versioning is nice - but do we need it? I think this nvram stuff is the most infrequent changing part of all of coreboot. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
