Stefan Reinauer wrote: > > Also when nvramtool detects invalid values, it can offer to program > > defaults or at least refuse to validate the checksum. nvramtool should > > be able to write anything though, through the use of some argument like > > --force. It should also be able to just set up everything by default. > > I think this is the fix we want. Forget the other stuff.
I agree it is part of what we want, but I think it is also pretty important for coreboot to gracefully ignore what appears to be a cluttered NVRAM, without making any changes to it. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
