>
> Stefan Reinauer wrote:
>
>>> Also when nvramtool detects invalid values, it can offer to program
>>> defaults or at least refuse to validate the checksum. nvramtool should
>>> be able to write anything though, through the use of some argument like
>>> --force. It should also be able to just set up everything by default.
>>>
>> I think this is the fix we want. Forget the other stuff.
>>
>
> I agree it is part of what we want, but I think it is also pretty
> important for coreboot to gracefully ignore what appears to be a
> cluttered NVRAM, without making any changes to it.
>
>
That's a one liner not to clear cmos in case the checksum is wrong.
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [email protected] • http://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
